Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the box


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. The nominator's concern was met during the AfD. Also, regular, long-running TV series are generally notable. However, the page badly needs some secondary sources to establish notability. I am tagging for sources and a re-run of this AfD would be in order if they cannot be produced in a reasonable time. TerriersFan (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

In the box
This seems to be an insignificant article, as it is less than four sentences long. J.d ela noy gabs adds 04:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A1, very short article containing no context, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, doesn't assert notability even with context added. I may be wrong but I don't think that TV shows are inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * TPH, there was more than enough context established: it's a TV show, and thus a valid stub. Whether that TV show is notable is for PROD/AFD to decide. hbdragon88 (talk) 07:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete based on current content. This article purports to be about a television program, but I can't even figure out what country it aired in. The show doesn't appear to be listed in the IMDb and there are no sources provided, making it unverifiable. However, it may be possible to improve this article before the AfD period ends. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article now identifies the country of origin, but there are still no sources. While the show did exist, I have not been able to find much information about it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The source given makes a strong case for notability if it can be verified, which shouldn't be to difficult.  What's the Australian equivalent of TV Guide?  Eluchil404 (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.