Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inamorata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was soft redirect to Wiktionary. –  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 10:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Inamorata
Dictionary entry, perhaps a transwiki to Wiktionary is in order?  James  Kendall   [talk] 10:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki, to wiktionary. --Soumyasch 11:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Already in Wiktionary. Feezo (Talk) 11:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, perhaps soft link to wiktionary? Alba 13:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Feezo. --Khoikhoi 05:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, please follow procedures for nomination as stated in WP:DP. This is not really the place for transwiki talk. An article with the same title can be found at wiktionary here however it is not the same. Transwiki it and then nominate for deletion don't do the opposite (if that is even possible). I can also foreshawdow, if there was a little research done, some example that are used in common practice. I don't know if these example would be better suited for wikipedia or wiktionary, no matter the case, keep until transwiki process is complete. --CyclePat 03:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.