Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inayatullah Faizi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Many !votes were variations on WP:VAGUEWAVE; a few "keep" !voters supplied sources to demonstrate notability, and were not challenged. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Inayatullah Faizi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth coverage found in WP:RS. Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  16:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Covered in several sources . Also a recipient of the Pride of Performance award, so clearly notable for his work.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 10:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Pride of Performance was awarded to 100+ individuals in 2010 so how such award can make him notable?  Greenbörg  (talk)  14:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Some publications but negligible citations. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:AUTHOR requires, "is widely cited by peers or successors". So: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mfarazbaig and a GScholar search which showed many citations. L3X1 (distænt write)  02:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you give a link? Xxanthippe (talk) 02:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC).
 * 23 cites which is rather low. L3X1 (distænt write)  19:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it certainly is low and totally fails to pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC).

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to allow assessment of new sources.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 04:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:NAUTHOR. --  Dane talk  06:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:NAUTHOR.further little information about the subject.Platogrew (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks WP:SIGCOV & fails to pass WP:NAUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.