Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inbox 2.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Inbox 2.0

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A Yahoo marketing code-name that never caught on as an actual term mentioned in a single New York Times 2007 article. --Michael WhiteT&middot;C 04:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect or merge to Web 2.0 given that the term has been mentioned by independent sources. editorEهեইдအ😎 17:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as still questionable for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  20:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete 2.0 - sometimes I'll suggest these be redirected to the 2.0 page but there doesn't seem to be a need here. Artw (talk) 01:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.