Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incheol Shin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Incheol Shin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't find sigcov in either Korean or English. This is the most significant piece of coverage:. Otherwise that's it; I can find one other brief mention of him in a short piece. toobigtokale (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  02:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Biology,  and South Korea. toobigtokale (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah shoot, I just saw that it was previously nominated for deletion and kept. Up to others; I think there's a case to keep the article based on that, but he's probably been on the margin of notability for a long time. toobigtokale (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep?. Large cites, albeit in a very high cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC).
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. It would be helpful if an editor could supply a link to any other AFDs for this article subject. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Does anybody have any views on this. If you do, can you please put a comment up. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  07:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete an h-index of 39 is not very high in life sciences, probably just an average ordinary professor would have such h-index. Moreover, the high h-index still does not fulfill the "as demonstrated by independent reliable sources" part of C1, and given no sources have arisen as part of this deletion process, I would suggest the subject does not fulfill any WP:NACADEMIC requirements. Broc (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. I'll see if comparing his citation metrics to those of coauthors is illuminating, might be a few days though. JoelleJay (talk) 06:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.