Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inchies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Speedily deleted - blatant spam. - Mike Rosoft 12:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Inchies

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Special:Log shows article was deleted Feb 11, 2007 by User:CambridgeBayWeather "Prod: No concrete proof of notability. Spam." I tried to speedy it, but it was rejected since it may have become notable in the past 7 months and a consensus is now required. Google returned nothing but blogs and Flickr images. It appears to be a non-notable art form. The page was created by a WP:SPA. I am falling back on the original deletion: "No concrete proof of notability. Spam." --Old Hoss 04:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete As nothing but spam. If it's notable, someone can write a real article about it.  Citi Cat   ♫ 04:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy. CSD#G4. ~   Wi ki  her mit  04:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per repost, so tagged. Giggy  Talk 05:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - G4 doesn't apply to prods (and this was one). Delete per spam, in that case.  Giggy  Talk 05:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, I took off the speedy tag under CSD G4 because the prior deletion had been an expired prod and G4 requires deletion by Afd. After this is deleted, we'll have that ammo needed to comply with CSD. I also thought spam but usually spam about something notable is fixable, so we're back to notability again. Carlossuarez46 05:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.