Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incident, Culfest of NITK Surathkal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter  (talk)  19:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Incident, Culfest of NITK Surathkal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

prod was declined by another user. looks like a whole bit of original research with no sources to establish notability. LibStar (talk) 08:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It's very badly written and full of peacock terms but the sources (just added?)are there and do establish notability.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 12:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

The reason I restored the article to this version was because the content was totally removed, and possible vandalism attempt was there. Logik 13:03, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. hey, the cited sources are well established Media houses in India. The weasel words and peacock words ( i like this term :P ) need to be toned down, I agree. but AfD is a bit too harsh a tag for this.


 * Keep - I've tagged the article as an advert because that is what makes up the bulk of the text. The article title also needs some fixing which can be done later if the article is kept.  The article references two articles from the Hindu which establish this as a notable student cultural festival.  If this article is kept, I'll be back to take a chainsaw to the advertising text. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.