Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incident.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  An as  talk? 22:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Incident.net

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article asserts that it is a well known French art collective, but no sources are provided. Large number of google hits but little to verify notability or content. Notability tag has been up for 8 months Daniel J. Leivick 00:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article must prove its notability through references, which is does not. Clearly violates WEB. the_undertow talk  00:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per above. Oysterguitarist 01:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, reluctantly, as incident.net is more or less well known among arty bloggers and so forth (being on the net since '94 makes you part of the scenery, practically). But I found no real references on a search of Google Books or Google News Archive. I would have thought otherwise given its overall reputation. --Dhartung | Talk 04:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely something I've heard of, but we can't play favourites. Delete as no reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  05:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.