Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inclusive thinking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. (WP:SNOW). NorthAmerica1000 06:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Inclusive thinking

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced essay/OR Jac 16888  Talk 22:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; recreation of an article deleted last month. Blackguard  00:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for the same reasons I tagged it earlier - it's an OR essay with no inline cites. —Swpbtalk 13:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete All sources are from Wikimedia, and it's an original essay, meaning it fails WP:NOTESSAY. Imitch5 (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 15:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Creative thinking, also called inclusive thinking, does exist, and thousands of sources could be found. But this is not it. Please, put it out of its misery and delete it. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -per WP:NOR. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  16:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.