Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Income Tax Department (Bangalore)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G12. Non admin closure as User:Future Perfect at Sunrise forgot to close the AfD. -Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 15:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Income Tax Department (Bangalore)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Local branch of a national agency, with the information either totally non-specific or organizational details  of concern only to those who work within it.  DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

If police organisations can have their own wikipedia articles,giving information then why the unnecessary picking on Income Tax Department.9(Nirmal95 (talk) 06:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC))


 * Delete - As a sub-sub-unit of an organisation with local juridisdiction, and no particular claim to notability beyond what the parent organisation does, it fails to meed the inclusion guideline for WP:ORG. -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

 Can i create the same website without copying?????(Nirmal95 (talk) 11:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)) contribs) 21:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as it is a copyright problem with http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/prototype/ccit/CBDT.asp (Duplication Detector report). ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 21:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, the nominator has a point, it has very little information about the agency itself (without the copyvio stuff), rather the people in it. ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 21:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The article is also a duplicate of Central Board for Direct Taxes, which has the same concept AND, coincidentally, the same copyright problem. --Michaelzeng7 (talk -
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.