Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Increasing biodiversity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 14:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Increasing biodiversity
Was originally proposed for deletion and was contested. The topic is already adequately covered in the biodiversity article, and as such should either be deleted or merged. --Impaciente 04:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, plus looks like a chunk of it is original research. Wickethewok 04:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anything worthwhile that's not already covered in other articles can be moved to Biodiversity. Zaxem 06:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Choalbaton 07:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. While under prod, I had reviewed and decided that it was already adequately covered in Biodiversity, so that a merge would not be worthwhile. GRBerry
 * Redirect to Biodiversity. Seems like a reasonable search term.  --Allen 14:46, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge anything salvageable, then redirect. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 20:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.