Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incred Finance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Incred Finance

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable finance company, tagged for factual accuracy, unsure of notability. I can't find sourcing in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and India. Oaktree b (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 01:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak Keep See, for the only GNG sources I found. As ATD, perhaps redirect and merge to Anshu Jain Belichickoverbrady (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Just FYI, this is based entirely on a company announcement (same as this in moneycontrol.com and simalarly the India Times article also relies exclusively on an company announcement. These fail WP:ORGIND.  HighKing++ 15:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 15:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Left me with the impression of a non-notable business, given the web search. Suitskvarts (talk) 07:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. I do not see WP:SIGCOV in independent WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP. Jacona (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.