Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Practitioners Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 06:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Independent Practitioners Network

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could not establish that this met any of the WP:NOTABILITY criteria. It was created by a user who is a member of the association and has a testimonial on their website - an IP removed all tags, including prod, saying that he/she was a member of this group and will be improving it. I would normally given that a chance, but am concerned that this may be being used for promotion, and I cannot see that he/she can establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 11:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: No evidence found of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 17:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero evidence of notability. &#39;DGG (at NYPL)&#39; (talk) 18:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.