Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent business


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Privately held company. per DICDEF and no independent notability as a term Nosebagbear (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Independent business

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Obviously, the term "independent business" is commonly used in English language. But this article is half WP:DICTDEF and half WP:OR. In my BEFORE, sure, I see plenty of works using this term, but none defining it for either scholarship or legal uses. Maybe this can be rescued, but if so, this needs a WP:TNT and rewrite from scratch with proper definititions and sources anyway (and, as I said, I didn't see any soruces in my BEFORE that jumped out as lending themselves to this task anyway, which also suggests a likely fail of WP:GNG here). PS. Not sure if the redirect to American Independent Business Alliance makes sense... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Privately held company, doesn't seem to have gone anywhere and doesn't explain anything. Josh Parris 07:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to, if necessary create in, Wiktionary: I agree that this is a dicef. It is also a useful term, but it is not an encyclopaedia article. Of itself the term fails WP:GNG. Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.