Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independents (Australian NUS faction)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Independents (Australian NUS faction)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ORG, article has existed for over 4 years with no citation. No significant third party coverage of this. Australian Matt (talk) 04:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  --  Bduke    (Discussion)  00:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - the only thing less notable than student politicians is unsourced articles about them. The complete lack of sources here also raises serious BLP concerns. Nick-D (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yep, this in unsourced because there's no significant coverage anyway. This does not contribute towards significant coverage. Neither does this, since it identifies Matthew Chuk as a "small i" independent. StAnselm (talk) 08:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.