Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndexMaster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Considering that all of the arguments are flatly WP:AADD (i.e. WP:ITSNOTABLE) I don't think it's worthwile continuing a discussion which as yielded no new comments in 2 weeks. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

IndexMaster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Wikieditor600 (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. The subject was non-notable back in 2007 when they were still opearting: considering they're now super-turbo-ultra defunct... -- a they/them &#124; argue &#124; contribs 21:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 11:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.