Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India–Vanuatu relations (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nearly a whole month and only one !vote, Relisting would only waste time so closing as NC (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

India–Vanuatu relations
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

as per my previous nomination. Fails WP:GNG. There isn't really much to these relations except diplomatic recognition and a one off donation for a disaster. No state visits, no agreements, no significant trade. I note that someone has added some generic information about India helping South Pacific countries but this is not Vanuatu specific. LibStar (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: The article can be redirected to Forum for India–Pacific Islands Cooperation and some history about India-Vanuatu can be added there itself. That target article should actually have historical relations of India and those islands anyways before the formation of forum. Few lines that are not generic from this article can be merged there and this can be redirected. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

— Tart (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep: The relations between the two are important to Vanuatu without doubt, as the large amount of trade that the page has mentioned. I see a lot of coverage and direct, significant relations between the two, as part of the WikiProject International relations, the reason behind for keeping is obvious.Tart (talk) 15:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * relations being "important" is not the same as notable. LibStar (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.