Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India-Latin America relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. There is consensus to keep the content. No prejudice against merging, if someone want to pursue that avenue and do the work. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

India-Latin America relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Articles on diplomatic relations are supposed to be country specific as long as they concern modern period. This article's title is too broad, inaccurate and whatever is added here can be already found on other articles. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't share that understanding of what counts as a legitimate article at all; there are many articles concerning country-to-region relations, such as Africa–India relations, Sino-Latin America relations, etc. Also, I would like to ask which other articles most of the information in this article can be found at. GreekApple123 (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Africa–India relations is based on historical relations while Sino-Latin America relations shall also require deletion. Ratnahastin  (talk) 06:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Politics, Economics, India,  and Latin America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or Merge the article is well formatted and cited with many references which covers this topic in depth. It does spun around the topic, passes general notability. However if merging is an option then I'd not oppose it merging in Foreign relations of India. Based Kashmiri (talk) 15:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. The page is well written and has many reliable sources with significant coverage on the India-Latin economic and trade ties and history. Passes WP:GNG. I am also not opposed to Merge to Foreign relations of India. RangersRus (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Duplicative of other articles. No point. Yilloslime (talk) 15:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom or Merge into other Indian articles about relations with Latin America
 * 48JCL (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is well sourced and covers India's relations with Latin America. With India's growing economy, this a topic which has been getting covered these past years. Dash9Z (talk) 07:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or merge? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep A brief look at the references in the article was enough to convince me that India–Latin America relations are a notable topic covered significantly by reliable sources. Those are reputable, scholarly sources, like The Diplomat and several journal articles, discussing this subject at length. Toadspike   [Talk]  23:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to Foreign relations of India, where it makes more sense for now. Content could always be split if it becomes more comprehensive. Dan the Animator 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per points made by other users advocating for keep. Will be open to work on it more post afd closure
 * Keep Article should be kept and rather expanded. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 02:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.