Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndiaHotelReview


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Flowerparty ☀ 00:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

IndiaHotelReview

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Downgraded from speedy deletion to proposed deletion, then the proposed deletion template was removed without addressing the concerns. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_India and the article talk page. This was very close to a db-spam speedy for me (I don't know much about how Indians view the hits in the Indian press, so I decided on a group discussion instead), but votes in favor of speedy wouldn't bother me a bit. - Dank (push to talk) 16:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Update: I just found out Indiahotelreview.com has been speedied 5 times over the last 3 years. - Dank (push to talk) 16:28, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 16:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 16:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The Indian Express piece is a casual mention in a blog on their site, not news coverage. There's one news piece in the Business Standard. As for the award, it's from a company that doesn't have a page on Wikipedia (at least not one that I could find) and it wasn't covered by the press either. So, at this point, I'm going to say Delete, but a page can come up when they become notable. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Fails WP:CORP. While I'm pleased to hear the site "commenced its journey on January 2007" I have to say the whole article looks spammy to me. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly spam that should have been removed as such at speedy deletion. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 02:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.