Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Tower (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep as per consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

India Tower
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The project is officially cancelled Soupysoap (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Stub and Keep. From media reports in Jan 2010, the plans for the tower exist, but they and the names are in flux. I found this and this which suggest that the project has been scrapped and has been changed to the Dynamix-Balwas towers (DB Towers) to be built at the same location. However this CNN IBN article continues to refer to it as India Towers. And a report in Times of India on 23 January 2010 (which also refer to it as "India Towers") says it is 105 stories and 300 m now. The article needs to be stubbed to a two line entry removing all the speculation about no of floors and height, till other media reports corroborate what is happening. However if reliable source reports can be produced to corroborate the cancellation, the article should be deleted--Sodabottle (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sodabottle. Rabbabodrool (talk) 21:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sodabottle makes a good point. The tower itself has been renamed and redesigned and hence, there is no reason to delete the article. The project itself is still in the planning stage as numerous articles online state. The article just needs updating. -- Effer AKS 21:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * CommentI have rewritten the entry to reflect only the information from the most recent news source available and have added a warning that information may change and the project is under construction.--Sodabottle (talk) 11:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:CRYSTAL requirements. Has two sources in article, and there could be many more. Dew Kane (talk) 03:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.