Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Airlines Flight 117


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on an early consensus. Missvain (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Indian Airlines Flight 117

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:NEVENT. Available coverage appears to be limited to primary sources. While there may be some secondary coverage available in newspaper archives that I can't access, as an event with minimal lasting consequences, it would likely still fall short of meeting the WP:LASTING criterion. signed,Rosguill talk 21:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a notable accident in any way. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Comment Austin–Bergstrom International Airport runway incident is a similar type of incident with same fatality number. Either both should be kept or both deleted. As for the sourcing, the incident of 1978 would have been reported on offline newspapers. An incident of this magnitude would have surely been extensively covered to pass our GNG case. Walrus Ji (talk) 07:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:PERSISTENCE. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright, I do agree that Lasting seems to be lacking. Changed my !vote to delete. I have moved some of the relevant content to Begumpet_Airport. So a redirect is also acceptable to me. Since some editors have suggested deleting the other one too, Please see Articles for deletion/Austin–Bergstrom International Airport runway incident. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Ping --Walrus Ji (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Sad, but not more than yesterday's news. We do not have an article on every suicide by cop or airplane. Bearian (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete that and the Austin incident too. Stragglers hit by aircraft are somehow unusual, but that doesn't necessarily make them encyclopedic. --Deeday-UK (talk) 21:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per OP. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -- as I gather any useful content has been merged. This does not strike me as a notable incident.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The paragraph at Begumpet Airport is sufficient. Estheim (talk) 00:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.