Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Citation Index (ICI)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G12 - The article as it stands is a verbatim copyvio from and  and the copyvio goes back to everything but the first revision that includes nothing more than the title, so deleting as copyvio. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Indian Citation Index (ICI)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A quick search regarding http://www.indiancitationindex.com/ shows an Alexa rank of over 4M and no independent GNews hits. This suggests that the subject does not meet the notability criteria at WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Significant promotional tone as well. PROD was contested by the author. VQuakr (talk) 08:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep article on important subject. Needs better sourcing. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC).
 * If you have reason to believe that sources meeting the GNG exist, can you provide them so they can be incorporated into the article? VQuakr (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I am unable to do this. I hope somebody else will. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.