Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Defence Contract Management Service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Military Engineer Services. Black Kite (talk) 20:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Indian Defence Contract Management Service

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Merge: The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing significant coverage. Per WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail". WP:BEFORE revealed nothing that would contribute to demonstrating WP:N. Some content could be merged into Ministry of Defence (India) Military Engineer Services.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi
 * I just got a message regarding nomination of this page for deletion. I would like to submit that this is one of the service in Military Engineer Services department under Ministry of Defence. Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Engineer_Services
 * All the supporting documents can be provided for this service. If you have any queries, pl let me know, I shall be happy to answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavedjindal (talk • contribs) 08:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Reply Hello, the existence of the department is not being questioned, but the location of the information. The information should be merged into Ministry of Defence (India) and the standalone article redirected to that location. The information would be preserved and in that location, much more likely to be found and read.  // Timothy ::  talk  11:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge department doesn't meet WP:GNG and contains minutiae (pay scales) that is of no importance. Mztourist (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is longstanding consensus to keep government agencies of major countries. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Reply Do you have any policies or guidelines to back up the claim that "There is longstanding consensus to keep government agencies of major countries" and that this overrides the guidelines and policies related to WP:N and the need for independent reliable secondary sources?   // Timothy ::  talk  11:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge with Military Engineer Services, being a branch of it. On a sidenote, these articles really need improvement. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 02:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment per (thanks) Military Engineer Services seems a better merge target. I have struck my original target and replaced it with this suggestion.   // Timothy ::  talk  03:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge with Military Engineer Services, and as in another similar AfD, I likewise would like to see the evidence that there's a consensus to keep every government agency.   Ravenswing     16:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.