Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Institute of Management Lucknow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was to Keep the article. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  18:21, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
The page gives no concrete information and has been lifted out of the institutes web site. Makes no sense keeping the article. (preceding unsigned comments by 4 November 2005)


 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 07:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as subject is notable, but this article is very POV - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 08:36, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, I fixed the POV but only by deleting the gushing prose, so it now deserves the stub tag more than it did. Hopefully someone with good knowledge of the place and a reasonably dispassionate view will now "do the needful" as they say. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 08:45, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. I voted keep on the AFD for a different campus of the institute as well. AFD is not cleanup. flowersofnight (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Though the article and the site of IIM-L are lousy, IIMs are top business schools in India. I can see that most of the first line of the article comes from but the rest seems okay. Someone made a bad-faith nomination for IIM Calcutta last week. That AfD was removed quickly after it received 7 speedy keeps and 10 keeps. Tintin 12:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep All articles on the Indian Institutes of Management need editing help, however, they are some of the best institutes in the region and have global potential. doles 15:52, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. It is generally agreed that verifiable tertiary education institutes are notable. Well done, Just zis Guy, for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster 17:08, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * keep this please there are a lot of reasons that it makes sense thank you just zis guy Yuckfoo 17:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - for obvious reasons. It is one of the most prominent B-Schools in India --Ravikiran 19:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The same IP has also nominated for deletion the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta and removed two times a quite objective ranking from the article of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 20:06, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Bad faith noms of all IIMs. Cleaned up the article and have tried to correct POV issues. Needs cleanup and substance. Prashanthns 17:14, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.