Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Muslims: Who Are They


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is similar to Articles for deletion/Muslim League Attack on Sikhs and Hindus in the Punjab 1947.  Sandstein  08:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Indian Muslims: Who Are They

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I cannot find sufficient coverage in reliable sources for this to meet the basic threshold for notability. Auxentios (talk) 19:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Unreferenced article with only 1 external link. Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable work. Since this article is about a book, and not the subject of the book, I moved it to the media category, since media covers books.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -- we cannot have an article on every book. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - the book certainly exists but it's far from notable Spiderone  22:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Easily passes WP:NBOOK and WP:BOOKCRIT. Cataloged by National Library of Australia. It has been subjected to multiple detailed reviews and detailed mentions by scholarly sources:
 * And more:
 * you both may want to review your !votes. Azuredivay (talk) 03:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * And more:
 * you both may want to review your !votes. Azuredivay (talk) 03:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * And more:
 * you both may want to review your !votes. Azuredivay (talk) 03:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources provided above. Meets WP:GNG. Shankargb (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The nomination was a failure of WP:BEFORE as the subject meets WP:NBOOK. Eliko007 (talk) 04:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the criteria of WP:BOOKCRIT is meeting here. I have already verified all the links posted above. Mention of the book in the catalogue of University, passing mentions in other books etc only prove that this is not a hoax article, these do not justify notability. The bar has been set higher as we cannot have article on every book. Walrus Ji (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as WalrusJi argues. There is are no in-depth reviews. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 19:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 19:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per Walrus Ji. Book exist but there is no in-depth reviews. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I found 17 citations on Google scholar and look through the majority of them. Nothing indicates that this book is notable in any way. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 02:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.