Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Summer (Zombie Computer album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Indian Summer (Zombie Computer album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:NALBUMS. preemptive to create WP article 5 months before release by a single purpose editor with no significant coverage. . LibStar (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - If it was keepable for three months without going to AfD and it's coming out in two, seems pointless to recreate it in two months. The only question is whether Zombie Computer is notable.  That may be the determinant here.  CycloneGU (talk) 00:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * because it hasn't gone to AfD before is a very lame reason for keeping. As per WP:CRYSTAL we cannot guess future notability. It may never reach WP:NALBUMS. LibStar (talk) 03:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * True, you got me on that one, thanks for the catch. However, it's been sitting three months and the album is about to be released.  I'm not using a crystal ball in any fashion, but more than half the time has elapsed to album release.  Two months before release seems reasonable.  But you have raised my only doubt; the album very well may never chart.  I say it depends on the artist's notability; if they have notability, it's a definite keep.  But I haven't researched the group fully, so I have no idea.  CycloneGU (talk) 04:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Delete - Even Zombie Computer themselves are not notable. They haven't released any recordings, and the WP article on them reads like something written by their promoter. An as-yet unreleased album by an unknown band is certainly not notable enough to keep.--Martin IIIa (talk) 23:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Album does not and possibly never will meet WP:ALBUMS. I would also strongly encourage someone to seriously look at whether their record company Psychonavigation Records or their band are worthy of articles. Wickedjacob (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.