Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian actress image gallery

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --malathion talk 02:15, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Indian actress image gallery
Yes, they're very attractive. No, this isn't encyclopedic. Many of these appear to be copyvios, regardless of the poster's assertion that "the website I found them on says they are in the public domain". Delete, and delete the copyvio images too. -- The Anome 22:24, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * A gallery with pictures of Indian actresses and....well, that's about it. Delete. AlbertR 23:01, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, pictures alone are a photogallery and a mere photogallery maketh not an article. This could be construed as a graphical list. I don't like lists, either, usually. -Splash 01:17, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, pretty clearly a case of WP:NOT. --nixie 01:19, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, and can not be a list. -- Eagleamn 01:23, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, while I don't mind this page WP:NOT says WP is not a "collections of internal links" or "[c]ollections of photographs or media files". So, change the system first if you want to keep this page. gren グレン
 * Delete unencyclopedic list. JamesBurns 05:26, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Nice but unencyclopedic. Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 21:02, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, unencyclopedic and portrays women as objects. Sarge Baldy 03:15, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. And check for image copyvio of the images. mikka (t) 19:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.