Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian village christ lutheran church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Indian village christ lutheran church

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be WP:NOTABLE; possibly promotional. Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Sending WP:APPNOTE to . Boleyn (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced article that fails WP:GNG. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T&middot;E&middot;C) 19:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Pretty obviously ported from someone's promotional website or the "About Us" link somewhere. Meanwhile, the article is useless. (Has a whole generation lost its thumb and become unable to find the shift key and capitalize? Or do people think that proper nouns don't need capital letters. . . even "Christ?") After one deciphers the title, it's pointing at a "Lutheran Church" called "Christ Lutheran Church" at a place called "Indian Village" in some US state or some nation. Hithladaeus (talk) 01:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and promotional. I suspect it's also a copyvio, but the copyvio checker isn't working for me right now. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – Does not meet WP:N. After several searches, only found one passing mention here, in the Grosse Pointe News. North America1000 05:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have speedied as spam if I'd got there first Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Substantial RS coverage not found in search. The article's tone is promotional because it's a paraphrase copy of the church's website. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Highly promotional page on a non-notable topic.  No obvious coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.