Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiana AFL–CIO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. Geschichte (talk) 08:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Indiana AFL–CIO

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subsidiary organisation does not seem to meet WP:NORG- lacks coverage in independent WP:RS and notability is inherited from the parent organisation. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator. Thank you for finding the additional source. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  04:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article includes a list of presidents without inline citations. If we can source this list during the AfD, that would constitute content of encyclopediac signififance that would justify a keep or merge outcome to this AfD. If we can show the list is inaccurate, the raison d'etre of the content is threatened and I'd be inclined to delete. Otherwise, if we have apparently encyclopediac content of unknown accuracy, I'd prefer draftify or redirect to delete. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 12:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep I added some more information about the history of the organization. It seems like the Indiana Federation of Labor, a direct precursor to the Indiana AFL–CIO is itself notable which we could just have be its own page also. TartarTorte 20:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per the single ref added by : a single, 18 page reference would not normally put a NORG over the bar for me, but this clearl y indicates the union has a long and significant history. In all likelihood, there are more refs out there. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 01:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.