Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigenouism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Indigenouism

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article on an "art movement" does not meet WP notability for WP:GNG. After reading the sourcing it is fairly clear it is WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. It was created by one of the blocked sock puppets of Amangpintor which coincidentally happens to be the pen name of the artist Elito Circa who is the originator of the "movement". It was heavily edited by Amangpintor's other socks. A BEFORE search did not turn up anything to substantiate that this is in fact a notable art movement, and the article sourcing seems to be a patchwork of synthesis, primary sources and name checks. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism that is not used by professional art historians or curators. Vexations (talk) 18:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.