Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indignatio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. With no prejudice against speedy re-nomination due to lack of participation here. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Indignatio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of a wiktionary page https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/indignatio. JamKaftan (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I've declined a speedy for hoax as the term does seem to exist. Whether it is deserving merely of a brief Wiktionary entry or of an article here, I leave to others. Peridon (talk) 19:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep but clean up. Reference 3 is enough to convince me this is a real term of rhetoric about which more could be said, though it needs to be said in a clearer way with contemporary sources in addition to (or rather than) translations of ancient sources. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.