Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indira Gandhi Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Indira Gandhi Hall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable women's hostel within Aligarh Muslim University. Can't find anything other than passing mentions. A redirect to the university was reverted; which btw would anyways be wrong as many such halls exist in India. Example at IIT Kharagpur (ref). §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a university prospectus; this is an unremarkable hall of residence, & I agree that given the name redirecting is not a suitable option.TheLongTone (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to the university I find nothing that indicates notability. It was built in 1995, so is not a historic structure. Can find nothing about an architect that might make it notable. No news mentions or other RS to indicate that it is anything other than a standard university living facility. SusunW (talk) 18:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the university as suggested seems to be the better option. —  San ska ri  Hangout \ संस्कारी 14:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Why redirect to AMU and not IITK? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree fully with the above: for this to be a suitable redirect it would have to be renamed mentioning the university & the redirect created by the move deleted. Seems like a lot of work for no good reason.TheLongTone (talk) 14:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.