Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Störm   (talk)  06:39, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 17:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. University-level institutions are usually notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Degree-awarding tertiary institution. When I see these institutions listed for deletion, my rule of thumb is always: would a similar institution in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, etc, ever be likely to be deleted? If the answer is no, then I do not think there is good reason for deletion (see WP:SYSTEMIC). That is, I think, the case here and indeed the case with pretty much every accredited degree-awarding institution around the world. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: I added text and a reference to indicate that this Institute attained autonomous status in 2017. There is also recent news coverage concerning on-campus conflict and concerns over performance, , but my opinion relies more on the UGC classification. AllyD (talk) 07:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.