Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indo-Western clothing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Indo-Western clothing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No WP:SIGCOV. Lots of mentions from reliable sources, but they never go in depth about the topic. Unreferenced since March 2014. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - The V&A are currently holding a major exhibition on Indian textiles including sections dedicated to modern clothing fusing Indian and Western fashion. I found this discussion of Indian-Western fashion connections in an academic book including references to the East-West synthesis. Here's another book on the subject of contemporary Indian fashion with lots of content on Western influences/cross referencing. Also, more discussion on the subject here. Yet more discussion in another academic book. The problem is that if you search for one very specific phrase, namely "Indo-Western clothing" you're not going to find an awful lot, as there are a lot of alternative terms for the concept, but in itself, it is very well-established and quite well-covered and clearly encyclopaedic enough to merit an article of its own. I actually think this article would be a perfect candidate for a student assignment. Mabalu (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep if improved with material from reliable sources that establishes the notability of the topic.Borock (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The current version doesn't have any references. Yann (talk) 10:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article also has potential. I'll pop by now and then to do a bit here and there. I've added a couple of refs. Others should add a bit in too. Good notable article potential and worth saving, but it needs work !!!!! Karl Twist (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mabalu's accurate analysis and sources. Cavarrone  11:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mabalu/systemic bias —Мандичка YO 😜 04:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.