Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indo G (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Although the articles desperatedly need sources, the subject of the article is sufficiently notable to meet WP:MUSIC, and, therefore, his albums are also notable enough to have their own articles. Non-admin closure. -- Agüeybaná  00:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Indo G
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The only asser of notability is that the artists worked with Three 6 Mafia. The article also does not cite any sources. Tasc0 22:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: also nominating the related articles.
 * --Tasc0 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * --Tasc0 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * --Tasc0 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * --Tasc0 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * --Tasc0 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * --Tasc0 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * --<b style="color:#002BB8;">Tasc0</b> 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Besides the Three 6 connection, he meets a WP:MUSIC criterion by having two albums released by Luke Records. -- Groggy Dice T | C 12:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. As Groggy Dice said, two albums on Luke Records, plus another on Relativity Records, would seem to qualify him under WP:BAND. Bondegezou 14:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Groggy Dice and Bondegezou, the Three 6 Mafia connection, the two albums on Luke Records, and the one on Relativity Records constitute notability. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 23:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to meep WP:MUSIC so has to kept, but definitely needs a good cleanup. -- Kudret abi Talk 07:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.