Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indonesia (Lonely Planet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 18:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Indonesia (Lonely Planet)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable book. 舎利弗 (talk) 15:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - the Moon and Lonely Planet title articles exist as (a) their dominance in the book market for information about Indonesia over the last 30 years (first Moon then Lonely Planet),(b) tourist guides are also used as standard references for information about the country, and if the Indonesian project had evolved sufficiently - and had a bibliography for the subject of Indonesia, the Lonely Planet title would be in the top 10 books that non Indonesian refer to for information about the country. (c) this reminds me of the nomionation of the Indonesian portal being put up fopr deletion. satusuro 15:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:BKCRIT. Which of those five criteria does the book meet? Items (a) and (b) you cited do not seem to fit these criteria. (c) is just WP:OSE and does not count into the argument. 舎利弗 (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, no redirect no particular coverage. While Lonely Planet certain deserves its own article, individual guides do not, nor is there any particular claim to notability for any particular guidebook in the series. Fails WP:GNG for lack of in-depth coverage and fails WP:NBOOK. --Bejnar (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, ditto Bejnar. CesareAngelotti (talk) 14:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.