Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indoor Cannabis cultivation (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. There also doesn't seem to be a healthy consensus to merge, but that discussion is for the talk pages, not for a deletion discussion venue. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Indoor Cannabis cultivation
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject covered at Cannabis (drug) cultivation, no need for 2 articles. Thanks, SqueakBox 03:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Cannabis (drug) cultivation.-- TBC !?!  04:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge ~ Agreed- deletion was already considered, but I could understand merging with Cannabis (drug) cultivation. Έρεβος 05:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This article supplements the information in the main article Cannabis (drug) cultivation and, as both articles are substantial, the need for the subarticle format seems clear. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment A merge would be appropriate, endless cannabis spin-offs isn't and I would urge you to merge the material. Thanks, SqueakBox 20:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Cannabis (drug) cultivation. Dgf32 (talk) 23:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep As per the first nomination, merging would make the main article way too long. Particularly so if you merged other associated articles, such as Outdoor Cannabis cultivation Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 13:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree very strongly re your length argument, we have enough information for one longish article and that is what would serve our readers best. Thanks, SqueakBox 18:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want to write a longish article about this and related subjects then you are free to do so. Mergers do not require deletion so why are we here? Colonel Warden (talk) 19:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The afd was started when redirecting was opposed, as it wasn't for the outdoor article, which is now a redirect. Thanks, SqueakBox 19:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no discussion on the talk page. This nomination seems too hasty. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Unsure. How many of the sources cited (actually cited, not tacked on the bottom of the article) meet our standards for reliable sources?  RFerreira (talk) 19:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * They don't seem good but there are hundreds of scholarly sources available. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If that is the case, I wouldn't be opposed to a delete and redirecting this title to Cannabis (drug) cultivation. RFerreira (talk) 19:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep --Jambalaya (talk) 21:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.