Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indoor enthusiast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Indoor enthusiast

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tendentious and devoid of useful content. Referenced only by a blog. Rathfelder (talk) 23:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree with previous comment and also want to point out it's not really a notable term in any manner and seems pretty sarcastic. There isn't enough substance to create an article on this topic.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   23:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable concept. This article is referenced only to a blog and is overtly speculative, as indicated by the frequent use of the word "might". Cullen328   Let's discuss it  01:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable and not encyclopedic. --  Dane talk  05:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable and even if there were more references it would be more suited to Wiktionary. TheMagikCow (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.