Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indraneel Bhattacharya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 19:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Indraneel Bhattacharya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Kellymoat (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment – No reason for delete has been offered – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * My finger hit "enter" when it shouldn't have, therefore no info was offered. BUT, I often get criticized for my nomination reasons, even though most of the articles I nominate do get deleted. So, really, why bother writing a reason. I may not be able to explain the reasons using proper WP "code words", but the nominations are valid. Kellymoat (talk) 16:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No grounds asserted for notability meeting WP:BIO. Bhattacharya's article looks like an advertisement & promotion of him. Looks like a paid article of a person, who has done lot of PR online, but didn't received any significant awards/recognition - WP:Notability. Seems a low-profile actor from India but not notable. Vinay089 (talk) 13:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I worked on article and have improved it by adding more information and cited with news references. Passes GNG.--Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Though the subject hasn't played the leading character in his films yet his supporting roles are significant enough and not minor appearances. His film and TV acting has received significant coverage in reliable sources like The Times of India and International Business Times. Winning an award isn't a WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR criterion. --Skr15081997 (talk) 12:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.