Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indrani Krishna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Indrani Krishna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Falls below the standard required by the General notability guideline. No sources found beyond the single news story, which indicates that the subject is a low-profile individual who is likely to remain so. Philg88 ♦talk 05:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - winning a college debate competition is not enough to meet GNG. No other claim to fame. -Zanhe (talk) 07:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

This page may have been vandalized recently. I'm not sure that blanking the page was the appropriate action. See: Diff JeremiahY (talk) 06:16, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Per the edit summary it looks like the editor concerned was acting in good faith in removing the personal puff piece rather than vandalising the article. It has no bearing on the AfD outcome since all the info removed was unsourced, which is acceptable under Wikipedia biographies of living people policy. Philg88 ♦talk 06:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Fair enough. I'm still not completely up to speed on AfD policies. I only found this page as it was flagged for CE by GOCE. JeremiahY (talk) 07:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.