Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Don't see any notability really, he has a website but it looks like basically someone who is just doing fashion and nothing else. Wgolf (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * DELETE. Nothing has changed one bit since Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee happened. This is a recreation of a deleted article and I notice that the same creator also recreated the previously deleted article Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE). Mabalu (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * In fact, I've spotted that the creator also tried to create this page (twice!) at Indroneel Mukherjee (IM) too - both were speedy-deleted. Can we salt? Mabalu (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * KEEP Significant changes has been made in the article and notable reference has been added such as The Telegraph review and Washington Bangla report on Indroneel Mukkherjee awesomeme111 18:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awesomeme111 (talk • contribs)
 * The Telegraph "review" is simply a mention in a list of half a dozen designers who participated in one show. The Banglal article is written by the subject. Neither source is remotely acceptable as evidence of notability. Mabalu (talk) 21:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Agreed Mabalu on the counters you have provided. What do you think on the other two references on the article? I will try searching for more references to make it stronger for a wiki biography. awesomeme111 12:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awesomeme111 (talk • contribs)
 * Since you asked: Sources in article: 1) - Mention in list of other designers (as with the Telegraph "review"). The second source simply states he was one of the judges and gives a couple tiny quotes. Really next to nothing to evidence his notability. I mean, we can see that he exists but absolutely no evidence that he is notable. Mabalu (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. &#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 16:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable BlueSalix (talk) 05:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.