Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indus Dictum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Indus Dictum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article provides no external sources to indicate notability, and it has been an article generated by a person with clear responsibility for the product. Conflict of interest most definitely. — billinghurst  sDrewth  03:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong delete As per nominator.Celestina007 (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello user billinghurst, I'm new to Wikipedia contributions and I'm not sure how to tag you or other users (I'm working on figuring out how). I sincerely apologise if there was any oversight of violation of ToS on my part. It is not my intention to promote Indus Dictum or my personal profile, and I am very careful about the conflicts of interest that may arise from my contributions. I assure you that any and all information that I have entered here is factually correct to the best of my knowledge. I am the founder of Indus Dictum, and I wasn't sure where to mention that (although my username is a total giveaway), but I urge you most kindly to not delete this page. Indus Dictum is a real foundation for journalism based in India, and you can see the list of contributors to our journal on the website. If I have entered any wrong information on the page, I will be most happy and quick to correct it. Please do let me know which areas of the text are in contravention of Wiki ToS and I will surely hasten to amend those portions. I do once again offer my sincerest apologies for any oversights. None of the information I have submitted is fraudulent, and we have a large following on various online platforms like wordpress, facebook and email subcriptions. I would be happy to share with you any verifications you may need in these matters. I hope we can edit the page to comply with the regulations, and will be glad to make the necessary changes immediately. Thank you. — Ankurborwankar (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Sincerely I can't find even unreliable not talk of reliable sources that reported about this "online stuff", the only result coming back is their own website. Non notable publication fails WP:GNG fails WP:WEB, the author has actual (but undisclosed) COI &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 13:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, non-notable website, COI issues, etc. Sro23 (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per others. A search for "indus dictum -indusdictum.com" reveals only internships by them. Galobtter (talk) 12:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.