Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industrial information economy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Bduke 03:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Industrial information economy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Definition of neologism from non-notable book, does not assert notability beyond being coined by notable author, no outside sources/independent usage apparent. Wnjr 13:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The term having been coined by a Harvard Professor (and co-director of the Berkman Center) is finding popularity of use. The use within academic circles is on the increase and this is likely to continue for the foreseeable future due to the high impact nature of his latest book. What needs to happen rather than deletion is expansion including referencing other sources now citing the term. See others commenting on sister term that was also marked for deletion Networked information economy. Fair amount of attention from academic sources; also seems to have already become somewhat genericized, suggesting independent notability as a TOA leedryburgh 16:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 11:32, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.