Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

advertising The Banner  talk 08:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  10:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep – The article does not have a promotional tone, and simply delineates the history of the organization, such as various name changes, and what it does in contemporary times, all in a neutral manner. The article does not extoll the organization in a promotional manner, does not attempt to recruit others to join the organization, and does not contain promotional buzzwords and peacock terms. Also not particularly impressed with the one-word rationale for deletion here, because it provides no qualification at all (e.g. WP:VAGUEWAVE). North America1000 03:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. This nomination brings no question about the notability of the subject, just claims it is advertising. I agree with North America's assessment. This article is not advertising. It discusses the subject with a neutral tone and provides several sources for verification. Jacona (talk) 09:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.