Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indy Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  04:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Indy Hall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BEFORE shows insufficient sources to meet notability criteria. Redirect suggested by A7 decliner is implausible. Waggie (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The subject has received coverage in numerous sources, including a couple of books. Meets WP:GNG and WP:ORGIND.- MrX 17:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity,, how many of those sources are a) based outside of Philly, and b) actually talking about Indy Hall, and not just mention that something happened there? Primefac (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't count them, but I did provide a link. There are enough sources to extract information for at least a small article. - MrX 18:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Those are rather lackluster sources. 1 is a paragraph that briefly mentions the owner saying something. 2 is a non-notable book that doesn't exactly provide coverage. And the other two are local coverage. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep. I hope no one expects me to make heroic efforts to save this article. I'm already overinvested.- MrX 18:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for sharing your vote and the Google Search link. I performed this Google Search as part of my WP:BEFORE, and just reviewed it again as due diligence.  I see a lot of passing mentions, interviews, local-only coverage, and thinly disguised blogs on job sites. I just don't see anything beyond what the article has already, and thus fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Waggie (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and my original csd. Yashovardhan (talk) 18:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep or Merge to Coworking – Meets WP:GNG, although perhaps on a weaker level, and meets WP:AUD, but a merge would benefit the Coworking article as well. If kept, this short article would benefit from expansion; at this time the article has no claim of significance. See below for some source examples. North America1000 03:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * "Coworking Growing in Popularity across Philadelphia". States News Service.
 * "The Indy Hall Experiment". Philadelphia.
 * "Timaree's Body: Indy Hall In-Depth". Philadelphia Weekly.
 * "Philly Is in the Middle of a Co-Working Boom. Here's Why". Thrillist.
 * Working in the Unoffice: A Guide to Coworking for Indie Workers, Small Businesses, and Nonprofits. Night Owls Press. p. 217.
 * Working in the Unoffice – pp. 53–54.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * "A New Way of Working". Success.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisted to encourage additional participation

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 09:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.