Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infantry Lua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 02:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Infantry Lua

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This seems to be about scripting some sort of game, but it's far more of a reference manual then an actual article. Wikipedia is not a game guide, and that includes a guide to scripting the game. — PyTom (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Random chunks of code, not sure exactly how to classify but breaks WP:NOT, probably under WP:NOT. Even if rewritten, subject appears to be non-notable. Doctorfluffy 05:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment How is this still open? (??) Should probably be relisted. Rocket000 (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weird. I tried using TW to list this, a long time ago. — PyTom (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * delete weird... I'm not totally sure if this is some sort of implementation of Lua (programming language) or something completely different. Either way, since there's no claim of notability I think it could be speedied, saving us the debate of which part of WP:NOT it fails. Pete.Hurd (talk) 16:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as... well, I'm not sure exactly what this is, but it sure as heck isn't an encyclopedia article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.