Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infernum (role-playing game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mongoose Publishing. Participants are encouraged to move over verifiable information as they see fit. Modussiccandi (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Infernum (role-playing game)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable game, unsourced article FMSky (talk) 06:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. FMSky (talk) 06:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; could not find secondary sources. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 06:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ununacceptable unreferenced substub. There is a chance it could be improved, of course. Ping User:BOZ who has done a lot to save many similar articles from the chopping block. Do ping me if this is improved. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I did find one source, and will see what I can do about finding more. I think that is enough to at least argue for a merge to Mongoose Publishing if all else fails. BOZ (talk) 13:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Artw and Hobit, I've been advised that RPG Geek lists a few reviews for the first two volumes. Infernum, Volume I: Book of the Damned was reviewed in: "Eye on Mongoose" Signs & Portents (Issue 20, Mar 2005, pg2), "Games" Game Trade Magazine (Issue 209, Jul 2017, pg25), and "RPG Reviews" Fictional Reality (Issue 20, Jun 2005, pg83) . Infernum, Volume II: Book of the Tormentor was also reviewed in "RPG Reviews" Fictional Reality (Issue 20, Jun 2005, pg83) . If anyone can find copies, that might help. BOZ (talk) 01:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree Merge is best option, unless more material can be dug up which doesn't look likely. Artw (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Given the one source, I'm fine with a merge. Ping me if anyone finds more. Hobit (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mongoose Publishing. Does not appear to have the coverage needed for its own article, but a reasonable redirect target exists.  Given the lack of information currently in the article, I'm not sure if there is anything here that would actually be appropriate to merge into that article, but I have no opposition to moving any information over to the redirect target if others see anything of value to move over. Rorshacma (talk) 17:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.