Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infershia Pantheon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 00:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Infershia Pantheon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article fails WP:PLOT because it is all plot information, cannot be cited with secondary sources per WP:FICT, and has no real world context (nor could a real world context be established). Pilotbob 03:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Deleting an article is not the first response to bad content. Fix it first. All of this seems to be in response to the keep of another article in the same series. We do not delete articles because of WP:NOT. We fix them.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 04:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * On review, this article could be merged into Underground Hades Empire Infershia if it is kept, because it is in exactly the same boat as Power Animal (Gaoranger) (although with much more superfluous plot summary that I will find someone who knows the subject to review).— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 04:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per protest vote above. Law/Disorder 04:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge: Just needs to be merged and trimmed of excessive details, just nominating a article for deletion and predicting that deletion is the only way is a bit overdoing it. If merge is necessary then I will suggest remove the excessive plot details and only focus on the key elements. -Adv193 20:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge: The article can be rewritten for conciseness, and be stuck back into Underground Hades Empire Infershia, where it was originally split off from.--Mr Fink 19:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable secondary sources to indicate it passes WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy 17:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.