Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- Phroziac (talk) 16:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I messed up. No consensus here, page has been restored. -- Phroziac (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington
A hoax, unverified information, and lacks notability. Svest 21:40, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Please place discussions on the discussion page.
 * I would like to point out that AFD is a discussion! Discussion should be here! -- Phroziac (talk) 16:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete or list under author as per the precedent for books that are not well-known enough to warrent their own encyclopedia article. Aquillion 21:47, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep http://www.bestwebbuys.com/Infiltration-ISBN_1595550038.html?isrc=b-search Ericd 22:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a prime example of the permutations of the paranoid conspiracist worldview on its omnivorous search for new targets.Cberlet 22:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep book, enough with this attempt to purge wikipedia of books that are critical of Islam. Please please please, keep separate your distaste for the subject of an article from the merits of the article itself or its encyclopedic nature. Klonimus 22:53, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As per Aquillion. --PhilipO 22:58, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article doesn't establish this book's notability, merely that it is part of a trend. Gamaliel 23:23, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. - brenneman (t) (c)  00:09, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep nice, NPOV article, certaintly not a stub. Sdedeo 00:24, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but get some facts into the article by somebody who has actually read it (reviews do not count). nobs 00:58, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Deleteper Aquillion. Karmafist 12:41, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a single book, with no special notability. Make a reference of it somewhere if you feel like it, but it doesn't deserve it's own encyclopedia page. --Icelight 15:21, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unnotable nutjob-written book. Dunc|&#9786; 18:52, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A good NPoV article. There is no reason to delete it. -- Karl Meier 21:08, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, is merely a book which does not seem to have any claim to notability other than being a book. Amazon rank: 16,112, which is nothing special. Lord Bob 01:25, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Refer to The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism on a similar discussion.--JuanMuslim 07:30, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Lord Bob. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:44, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Aquillion. a-n-o-n-y-m 03:56, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the controversy of this book's is somewhat notable. The article is not a hoax, and the article information should be verifiable to the book or reviews, etc. Whether or not the book is substantiated is another story, but that doesn't mean it should be deleted without at least some discussion about it's contents. --AI 23:33, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Aquillion --Irmgard 12:01, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.