Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite Light


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Infinite Light

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has zero sources; externally linked website of band is dead. Unresolved notability tag has been on article for last 4 years. Cursory search for RS finds nothing. BlueSalix (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Utterly non-notable and zero sources. Admiral Caius (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Searched all the usual sources, but I cannot find any indication that this band meets the guidelines for inclusion set out at WP:MUSICBIO. — sparklism hey! 08:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. A zero page. Szzuk (talk) 21:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I usually vouch for pages of bands that have the slightest bit of notability in any scene, but these guys are completely unknown even by Internet underground standards. Literally less than a hundred listeners in last.fm and there's and average of two votes for their albums in RYM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.190.31.213 (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.